Comments on: Interview with Timothy King https://paintingperceptions.com/interview-timothy-king/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=interview-timothy-king perceptions on painting Mon, 03 Jul 2023 16:38:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: michael neary https://paintingperceptions.com/interview-timothy-king/#comment-116504 Sat, 06 May 2023 12:51:14 +0000 https://paintingperceptions.com/?p=14790#comment-116504 Great interview !- and thank you for taking the initiative to form the Midwest Paint Group and for the dogged persistence that has kept it together.

]]>
By: Timothy Kimg https://paintingperceptions.com/interview-timothy-king/#comment-116481 Fri, 05 May 2023 21:54:01 +0000 https://paintingperceptions.com/?p=14790#comment-116481 Larry, the last question you asked me about was what I found most interesting about Gabriel Laderman and I didn’t answer directly; even though I commented enough to show why I was interested in his ideas and his art. That was one part I cut off for the sake of space. Lester Goldman introduced Gabriel to his students along side the other realist and figurative painters showing in New York in the 1970’s. Laderman, Bell, De Niro, Matthiasdottir, Bailey, Anderson, Kresh and many more who were all acquainted to each other. Lester provided those artists as hero’s for us young students. We didn’t use the term post abstract figuration but we knew how these figurative painters had come out of the abstract expressionism schools or like Bell more from the Helion and Arp European plastic abstraction influence. So I knew and appreciated Gabriel’s artistic linage including his study with Hoffman, and I liked his realist and naturalist work. I had a book on landscape painting with one of his works that impressed me. But after my days at KCAI I didn’t see much about Gabriel’s art and I was very isolated in Tulsa and Chicago from the New York art world. And the art magazines seemed to have moved away from that New Realism and on to postmodernism. The Internet wasn’t a thing until later in the 90s and it took awhile before all the currently available art imagery was online. When I got that first email from Gabriel it was quite literally a shock to me. I never even met any of those painters Lester had shown us. I hadn’t gotten to meet Leland Bell though I did see him speak at KCAI.

What meant a lot to me was Gabriel would look at my paintings and drawings and talk to me about them in detail. And Gabriel had all kinds of history stories about the art world and personal experiences with famous painters like Uglow and Guston. I wasn’t really being mentored by anyone except Stanley Lewis at that time and Stanley wasn’t on email or the internet. Gabriel was quite technologically adept so I had more regular communications including phone conversations with emails. With Stanley, I would call as frequently as it seemed he had time between his teaching schedule, travels and his strict daily painting regiment which I tried to respect. So Gabriel filled a gap in that generational seniority I’ve always wanted and probably needed for their experience and wisdom. I used to be able to connect with Lester Goldman on my trips back to Kansas City that same way. I never had that with Wilbur Niewald until I got to work with him on the Midwest Paint Group Figure exhibition catalog in the 2010’s. After that we reconnected and had some interesting phone conversations and visits at his studio in KC. I’ve gone on to keep my connection with several other mentors. I was close with Ron Weaver who joined the Midwest Paint Group. Ron was a studio mate and friend of Stanley Lewis at Yale. His passing was a blow to me. I’ve had a similar connection with other painters like William Barnes who ran the painting program at William and Mary College and Bill White who is also in the Midwest Paint Group. I was close to my father and when he died I really saw how significant all these mentors have been to me as a painter and as a person.

]]>